<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rickey Whitworth&#039;s Blog &#187; Citrix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whitworth.org/tag/citrix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whitworth.org</link>
	<description>insights from managing a microsoft enterprise infrastructure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 21:02:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>CTX118226 &#8211; User Client Computer Profile is not Loaded Properly when Single Sign-on is Enabled &#8211; Citrix Knowledge Center</title>
		<link>http://www.whitworth.org/2010/05/03/ctx118226-user-client-computer-profile-is-not-loaded-properly-when-single-sign-on-is-enabled-citrix-knowledge-center/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitworth.org/2010/05/03/ctx118226-user-client-computer-profile-is-not-loaded-properly-when-single-sign-on-is-enabled-citrix-knowledge-center/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 14:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rwhitworth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitworth.org/2010/05/03/ctx118226-user-client-computer-profile-is-not-loaded-properly-when-single-sign-on-is-enabled-citrix-knowledge-center/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’ve had what appears to be an increase in roaming profile problems over the last several months. Reading this article, it may be tied to the version of the citrix client running on the Windows XP machines. 
When running ICA Client version 10.200 and later on Windows XP, any service pack, a user logon does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve had what appears to be an increase in roaming profile problems over the last several months. Reading this article, it may be tied to the version of the citrix client running on the Windows XP machines. </p>
<blockquote><p>When running ICA Client version 10.200 and later on Windows XP, any service pack, a user logon does not load the cached profile but creates a new one instead.</p>
<p>The result is that Windows ends up caching several profiles for the same user.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX118226">CTX118226 &#8211; User Client Computer Profile is not Loaded Properly when Single Sign-on is Enabled &#8211; Citrix Knowledge Center</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitworth.org/2010/05/03/ctx118226-user-client-computer-profile-is-not-loaded-properly-when-single-sign-on-is-enabled-citrix-knowledge-center/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Project Pictor at Jeff Muir</title>
		<link>http://www.whitworth.org/2007/10/01/project-pictor-at-jeff-muir/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitworth.org/2007/10/01/project-pictor-at-jeff-muir/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitworth.org/Blog/PermaLink,guid,63ab9e6c-1973-4281-b114-a19511472be0.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#160;



An old article from last year about an initiative to help with graphically intensive
applications. I have seen some forum posts that suggest this may be part of the longhorn-version
release of Citrix. 

Excerpt: 

As you may have heard, we have a project code-named Pictor. This project is derived
from work done with Boeing to improve the responsiveness [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
An old article from last year about an initiative to help with graphically intensive<br />
applications. I have seen some forum posts that suggest this may be part of the longhorn-version<br />
release of Citrix. </p>
<p>
Excerpt: </p>
<p>
As you may have heard, we have a project code-named Pictor. This project is derived<br />
from work done with Boeing to improve the responsiveness of OpenGL three dimensional<br />
drawing programs (CATIA). The Boeing/Citrix project (codenamed K2) was a large success<br />
and proved not only that it was possible to greatly improve the performance, it actually<br />
made sense to progress this software to a much wider audience. </p>
<p>
I have my own history with what I would call graphics intensive applications. When<br />
I was first working as a systems engineer reseller in Brisbane in 1997, our little<br />
company was approached by a local engineering company. I believe they make custom<br />
car parts and it was very interesting how they went about it. They were a fairly big<br />
operation and very professional. Our salesman (as expected) over-promised what WinFrame<br />
could do. The thoughts were that it should be possible to remote CAD images over ICA.<br />
Somehow, I was supposed to get this working. It became pretty obvious that with no<br />
amount of tweaking would it be possible to run decent CAD across ICA. </p>
<p>
So, that was the common conclusion of most people between 1995 and now that it just<br />
was not possible to do intensive graphics remoting. The exception being programs being<br />
designed this way from ground up (like 3D games). </p>
<p>
Now, a group a Citrix has proven it possible to remote existing applications without<br />
change. It is not just a demo, it is a working system being used at Boeing. In this<br />
case, the hype actually understates the possible reality. </p>
<p>
The reason Iâ€™m writing this is to drum up some interest in Pictor. First, I want you<br />
to know it exists. Second, I want you to tell everyone that you want it (if you want<br />
it). If you stay silent, there is a good chance that Citrix will focus on other items<br />
on the agenda. </p>
<p>
If you prefer, leave me a comment and Iâ€™ll forward it to the relevant people. </p>
<p>
If the project goes ahead in the near term, it will most likely be based out of Sydney,<br />
Australia. I know one of the core developers and Iâ€™m sure heâ€™d love to hear what you<br />
have to say.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
<a href="http://citrite.org/blogs/jeffreymuir/2006/10/26/project-pictor/">Project<br />
Pictor at Jeff Muir</a>
</p>
<p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.whitworth.org/Blog/aggbug.ashx?id=63ab9e6c-1973-4281-b114-a19511472be0" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitworth.org/2007/10/01/project-pictor-at-jeff-muir/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>User Profile Best Practices for Metaframe Presentation Server</title>
		<link>http://www.whitworth.org/2007/04/12/user-profile-best-practices-for-metaframe-presentation-server/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitworth.org/2007/04/12/user-profile-best-practices-for-metaframe-presentation-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitworth.org/Blog/PermaLink,guid,79b9a2c2-67f2-4517-963a-f07db679b498.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Knowledge Base Article CTX110351 on
Citrix explaining User Profile Best Practices for Presentation Server. Discusses options
like using different roaming profiles for different Presentation Server Silos (for
example you have a group of servers running a LOB app and another running general
apps).


Excerpt:


Introduction



An effective design of user profiles can make a significant
difference in the performance and manageability of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://support.citrix.com/kb/entry.jspa?entryID=10171">Knowledge Base Article </a><strong><a href="http://support.citrix.com/kb/entry.jspa?entryID=10171">CTX110351</a> </strong>on<br />
Citrix explaining User Profile Best Practices for Presentation Server. Discusses options<br />
like using different roaming profiles for different Presentation Server Silos (for<br />
example you have a group of servers running a LOB app and another running general<br />
apps).
</p>
<p>
Excerpt:
</p>
<p>
<span class=stellent-heading1><b><a name=P67_1625></a>Introduction</b></span>
</p>
<ul>
<p>
<span class=stellent-default>An effective design of user profiles can make a significant<br />
difference in the performance and manageability of a MetaFrame Presentation Server<br />
environment. Many of the issues commonly seen in large or complex MetaFrame Presentation<br />
Server environmentsâ€”including slow logon, loss of user settings, profile corruption,<br />
and excessive administration effort&#8211;are often the result of sub-optimal user profile<br />
designs. A solid design and implementation of user profiles can maintain the integrity<br />
of user settings, eliminate issues requiring administrator intervention, and ensure<br />
high-performance user logon.</span>
</p>
<p>
<span class=stellent-default>This white paper will present Citrixâ€™s best practices<br />
for the design of user profiles in a MetaFrame Presentation Server environment.</span>
</p>
<p>
<span class=stellent-default><a href="http://support.citrix.com/kb/entry.jspa?entryID=10171">Read<br />
the full article at the Citrix Website</a></span>
</p>
</ul>
<p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.whitworth.org/Blog/aggbug.ashx?id=79b9a2c2-67f2-4517-963a-f07db679b498" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitworth.org/2007/04/12/user-profile-best-practices-for-metaframe-presentation-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.310 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2011-10-01 07:41:14 -->

